No unisex please we're British October 1st 2008 Do washrooms really need to be separated by gender? Single parent families are on
the increase; men are more concerned about appearance and younger women are
becoming more 'laddish'.SCA Tissue Europe's Jenny Turner looks at the pros and cons
of a more continental unisex approach
Male and female roles are changing all the time. Fathers are
becoming more 'hands-on' and it is now commonplace for a
dad to change a baby's nappy or take a child to the loo.
Meanwhile, the male grooming industry is growing rapidly and men
are paying more attention to their appearance.As for women, they
are becoming more practical and business-like, and a growing
'ladette' culture is emerging. So why are our Ladies and Gents toilets
stuck firmly in the past?
The Gents is still often a fairly basic affair with urinals, stark walls
and scruffy fixtures.Mirrors are not necessarily supplied and there
may be fewer basins and hand towel dispensers than in the Ladies.
The smell in the Gents is often more unpleasant too, since air
fresheners are not
always installed and
the use of urinals can
lead to a build-up of
uric acid in the tile
grouting.
The Ladies, on the
other hand, tends to be
a much cosier
environment.A mirror
and vanity shelf is more
or less expected and in
hotels and restaurants
there may also be fresh
flowers and hand
creams to add to the
'home from home'
ambiance. Frilly
curtains and fluffy
towels often complete
the overall impression
of a highly feminine
environment straight
out of the 1950s.
The differences
between these two
washroom experiences
are surely greater than
they need to be.While
modern women obviously appreciate clean, hygienic washrooms, few
of them actually require any of the extra frills and fripperies that are
often provided.Men on the other hand would probably appreciate a
few more comforts than they have come to expect.
Moving towards communal facilities would be a drastic change
from the status quo, but unisex washrooms would certainly have
some advantages. Single fathers would no longer have to worry
about taking their youngsters into a sleazy, run-down Gents
washroom.Mirrors would finally be made available to all, and urinalshy
men would have greater access to cubicles.
More importantly, hand hygiene might well improve. Statistics
show that men are more likely to neglect hand hygiene than women
– maybe because Gents washrooms are a less pleasant place to linger
than the Ladies. In fact since women appear to expect higher
standards in a washroom than men, a move towards unisex
washrooms could help to raise standards across the board.
However,we in Britain have a long-standing tradition of separate
washrooms and a widescale switch to unisex facilities may meet
some resistance.When SCA Tissue Europe carried out a survey to find
out what the public liked and disliked about public loos,we found
that unisex toilets abroad were frequently listed among the 'dislikes' –
though interestingly enough, only by women.
It could be that women feel they have less to gain if washrooms
were to become unisex.Communal facilities would probably be less
desirable in areas where the presence of males might intimidate
female users, such as in isolated parks or in schools for instance.
There is also the embarrassment factor to take into consideration.
While our continental counterparts may take a more pragmatic
approach to toileting, British men and women will not necessarily feel
comfortable about performing personal grooming tasks – or using
sanitary protection or condom machines – in one another's presence.
And the Ladies washrooms in bars, restaurants and clubs are
traditionally seen as an all-female refuge.
So while it seems unlikely that we in Britain will switch to unisex
washrooms anytime soon, there have definitely been a few moves in
this direction already.Gents washrooms in hotels and restaurants are
generally becoming smarter and more conducive to grooming than
in the past. Upmarket pub chains such as Wetherspoon and All Bar
One are now providing communal washing areas outside individual
Ladies and Gents toilet cubicles.Meanwhile, mens' and womens'
washrooms in high-traffic areas such as shopping precincts and
service stations are becoming increasingly uniform, with 'family
washrooms'often provided in place of mother-and-baby rooms.
Such washrooms are often more open-plan affairs, screened off
from one another by partitions rather than doors. Partitions may not
provide the privacy experienced in completely separate facilities, but
they do create a more hygienic environment since they eliminate the
need for visitors to touch a door handle after washing their hands.
So perhaps such washrooms will become the norm in future,
allowing Gents and Ladies facilities to become more uniform while
also remaining separate.We may also see a move towards the
washroom provision experienced in other European countries such
as Sweden, where office toilets are often unisex cubicles with their
own washing facilities.These allow both men and women to carry
out personal grooming tasks in complete privacy.
In today's climate of equality, there is no convincing argument in
favour of separate washrooms for men and women – other than the
fact that a few of us seem to want them. Perhaps the best answer for
all of us would be to ensure that every public washroom – both
Gents or Ladies – provides a hygienic, comfortable and efficient
environment for every visitor. For information on SCA please contact
the company using the telephone
number provided. More articles from SCA Tissue Europe: |